Ori Learning
    Case Study

    How Ori Learning rebuilt inbound demand after a rebrand collapse

    Ori Learning is a K–12 EdTech company selling into US school districts. Following a major rebrand in 2023, the company lost over 80% of its organic traffic, inbound demos dried up, and brand recall dropped sharply.

    We rebuilt their go-to-market system using Content RevOps — turning content, automation, and sales signals into a single revenue-facing operation. Within 12 months, inbound leads increased by 680% and organic traffic grew by 4,500%.

    Industry:EdTech (K–12, Special Education)
    Sales motion:Mid-market / district-led
    Buyers:Administrators, procurement, educators
    Sales cycle:Long, trust-driven
    Core constraint:High CAC, slow pipeline

    The situation

    Ori Learning had a strong product and a clear niche, but the rebrand disrupted their existing demand engine.

    They were operating in a market where trust matters more than reach, buyers research extensively before engaging sales, and outbound and ads are expensive and unreliable. Inbound had been their most efficient channel — and it vanished overnight.

    The problem

    80% drop in organic traffic post-rebrand

    Inbound demo requests fell to near zero

    Content existed, but didn't drive conversations

    Sales lacked visibility into buyer intent

    Growth depended heavily on manual outreach

    Marketing activity was happening — but it wasn't connected to revenue.

    The solution

    We rebuilt Ori's growth system around Content RevOps: treating content as infrastructure, not output.

    1. Brand & Positioning

    We clarified Ori's positioning around a specific, underserved need in special education. Messaging shifted from generic feature descriptions to a clear "ready-to-teach, UDL-based" promise that resonated with district buyers.

    2. Automation & Sales Signals

    We implemented no-code data enrichment and automation to surface real buying intent: district-level profiling, trigger-based alerts for high-intent actions, and automated handoff from content engagement to sales.

    3. Content as a GTM System

    We built a resource hub with 200+ problem-led, SEO-driven articles and tools. Each asset served three purposes: demand capture (SEO), lead qualification, and sales enablement.

    4. Revenue Integration

    Content became the front door to the pipeline — not a blog. Sales stopped guessing. They responded to signals, turning content engagement into qualified conversations.

    The results

    All results sourced from Search Console, SEMrush, and HubSpot dashboards.

    +0%

    Organic Traffic Growth

    +0%

    Inbound Leads Growth

    0

    SQLs in First Month

    0%

    Visitor-to-Demo Rate

    0+

    Ranking Keywords

    Organic Traffic Growth

    Google Search Console — Monthly Clicks (from ~300 to 15,000+)

    Sep '23Oct '23Nov '23Dec '23Jan '24Feb '24Mar '24Apr '24May '24Jun '24Jul '24Aug '24Sep '2404K8K12K16KContent RevOps Launch

    Inbound Leads Growth

    HubSpot — Monthly New Contacts (from 21 to 164 peak)

    Sep '23Oct '23Nov '23Dec '23Jan '24Feb '24Mar '24Apr '24May '24Jun '24Jul '24Aug '24Sep '2404590135180System Launch

    Organic Keyword Growth

    SEMRush — Total Ranking Keywords (from ~100 to 3,200+)

    Oct '23Nov '23Dec '23Jan '24Feb '24Mar '24Apr '24May '24Jun '24Jul '24Aug '24Sep '2408001.6K2.4K3.2K

    Why this worked

    Ori's turnaround wasn't about "more content."

    It worked because of how content was connected to the entire revenue system:

    Content was designed around buyer intent

    Automation connected engagement to sales

    Marketing and sales operated on shared signals

    Content reduced time-to-value for prospects

    This is what happens when content becomes a revenue operation — not a marketing expense.

    Want to explore this approach?

    If you're operating in a trust-led market with long sales cycles and high acquisition costs, Content RevOps may be a better growth lever than ads or outbound.