Competitor & Category Content Analysis
No content strategy can exist in isolation, and as a result, we need to understand the ecosystem of ideas and content that exists before we attempt to enter it.
Work out what the market is already saying, where it works, and where the gaps are.
We are not just looking at competitors as businesses.
We are looking at how they use content:
what gets attention
what gets ignored
what is overdone
what is missing or unclear
What we analyse
We look across four groups:
direct competitors
adjacent players
industry publications
alternatives (DIY, status quo, internal workarounds)
How we do it
1. Identify top-performing content
For each competitor:
pull their top organic pages
focus on traffic, not keyword volume
review any active paid ads
This shows what they are actually pushing and what is already working.
2. Review content manually
We go through their strongest pages and look for:
topics and angles
how they frame the problem
level of depth
whether it is useful or generic
how commercial vs educational it is
The goal is to understand what the content is really doing, not just what it says.
3. Look at social output
We review recent posts and focus on:
what gets strong engagement
what themes repeat
what consistently underperforms
This helps us separate signal from noise.
4. Analyse reviews and sentiment
We look at public feedback to find:
repeated complaints
repeated praise
unmet expectations
emotional language
This often reveals gaps that competitors are not addressing in their content.
5. Scan broader market content
We review publications and adjacent players to understand:
what topics attract attention
what formats are common
what the market is actively trying to learn
This shows where demand already exists.
6. Use AI to organise patterns
Once the manual work is done, we use AI to:
group recurring themes
compare competitors
cluster topics and formats
surface repeated language
AI helps organise the inputs, not replace them.
7. Identify strengths and gaps
For each competitor, we summarise:
Where they are strong
topics that gain traction
formats that work
channels they perform well in
Where they are weak
problems they avoid or only cover lightly
content that gets low engagement
gaps between what customers complain about and what they publish
We pay more attention to what is missing than what is present.
What we end up with
a clear view of what content already works in the market
patterns across competitors, publications, and alternatives
common themes, formats, and messages
recurring complaints and unmet expectations
a shortlist of content gaps
a shortlist of narrative opportunities based on those gaps
This gives us a grounded view of where we can say something better, clearer, or more useful than what already exists.
